|
May 05; Constitutions and constitutional developments
in Sri Lanka, Pakistan and India offer similarities as well as opportunities
to learn from each others. So agreed speakers at the PILDAT
Conference on Lessons for Constitutional Development in South Asia
that took place on May 05, 2016 in Islamabad. Three Constitutional Experts,
one each from India, Sri Lanka and Pakistan highlighted their country’s
respective of Constitutional Development.
Sri Lanka, Pakistan and India,
all three have Federal and Parliamentary systems. All three are also looking
for empowered local governments and further strengthening constitutional provisions
for protection of religious minorities. Although the three countries have witnessed
different trajectories of Constitutional development, the models in place in
each country offer a lot to learn.
Acting Sri Lankan High Commissioner, H.E.
Mrs. E. A. S. Wijayanthi Edirisinghe, Vice Chancellor, West Bengal
National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata, India, Professor
Dr. Ishwara Padil Bhat and Senior Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan;
Former Governor; Former Federal Minister, Mr. Shahid Hamid,
spoke at the Conference as three esteemed Constitutional Experts.
Indian High Commissioner, H. E. Mr.
Gautam Bambawale, also shared his perspective at the Conference. A
complete copy of his speech can be accessed here.
Acting Sri Lankan High Commissioner, H.E.
Mrs. E. A. S. Wijayanthi Edirisinghe said that at the moment, Sri Lanka
is in the process of drafting a new Constitution, the effort for which was being
spearheaded by the Public Representations Committee on Constitutional Reforms.
This Committee has developed a unique model of public consultations, seeking
the views and advice of the people ahead of formulating its recommendations.
She stated that the need of a new Constitution has arisen due to the experience
that the country underwent during the Rajapakse regime after the end of the
30-year insurgency by the Tamil separatists, which increasingly saw powers being
concentrated in the Office of the President. She highlighted that shuttling
between a Presidential and Parliamentary Constitution has only had a negative
impact on the country’s Constitutional Development. Therefore, the growth
of the Constitution had been haphazard, not organic. Her complete remarks are
based on the Background Paper authored by Mr. Lal Wijenayake, Chairman
Public Representations Committee for Constitutional Reforms, Sri Lanka, who
could not join the Conference but sent his presentation which can be accessed
at: Constitutional
Developments in Sri Lanka.
Sharing Pakistan’s trajectory of Constitutional
development, Mr. Shahid Hamid said that military rule automatically
converts a Parliamentary form of Government into a Presidential one, as had
often been highlighted in Pakistan’s case. He highlighted that given the
18th Amendment had been passed, the current Constitution was not that of 1973;
rather, that of 1973 as heavily amended in 2010. He stated that the 18th Amendment
had restored the original spirit of Parliamentary democracy in Pakistan. He,
however, observed that Constitutional forums for debate and discussion, such
as the Council of Common Interests, have not emerged as effective due to their
infrequent meetings. The Background Paper authored by Mr. Shahid Hamid for the
Conference can be accessed at: Constitutional
Development in Pakistan.
Professor Dr. Ishwara Padil Bhat highlighted
that Indian Courts consider federalism as the Basic Structure of the Constitution,
beyond the amending powers of the Parliament. Pointing out India’s experience
of federalism, he stated that well-planned federalism is a fort against national
disintegration, especially in a country as diverse as India. He stated that
from the angle of good governance, Parliamentary system has the advantage of
flexibility, responsibility and control over the Executive. The Background Paper
authored by Professor Bhat can be accessed at: Constitutional
Development in India.
Earlier, in his opening remarks, Mr. Mehboob
said that in the context of Constitution making in the Sub-Continent, the month
of April has a special meaning. The Constitution of Pakistan was passed by the
National Assembly on April 10, 1973; April 14, 2016 marks the 125th Birth Anniversary
of Dr. Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar, who chaired the Drafting Committee of the Indian
Constitution. It was also on April 28, 2015 that Sri Lanka passed its 19th Constitutional
Amendment, which introduced key reforms in terms of rebalancing the powers of
the Executive Presidency and the Parliament.
Participants at the Conference included prominent
scholars, writers, MPs, law faculties and media persons who engaged in a keen
and candid exchange of views with the Speakers. Members of the National Assembly
including Mr. Shehryar Khan Afridi, MNA, PTI and Ms. Nafeesa Khattak, MNA, PTI
joined the Conference. Senators who were in attendance included Senator Hasil
Bizenjo, NP; Senator Dr. Jahanzaib Jamaldini, BNP-M; Senator Usman Kakar, PMAP;
Senator Karim Khawaja, PPP; Senator Sardar Muhammad Azam Musakhel, PMAP and
Senator Lt. Gen. (Retd.) Abdul Qayyum, PML-N. A member of the Provincial Assembly
of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Ms. Sobia Shahid-PML-N, was also in attendance.
As part of PILDAT’s focus on assessing
Quality of Democracy in Pakistan, the Conference by PILDAT was also organized
to commemorate Constitution Day, inspired by an initiative by the Senate of
Pakistan, on the anniversary of the passage of the 1973 Constitution of the
Islamic Republic of Pakistan. The Conference was organized to showcase a comparative
and holistic insight into the story of Constitutional Development in South Asia. |
|