|
|
EVENTS |
|
> India-Pakistan Parliamentarians Dialogue-VI
December 11-12, 2014; New Delhi, India
Joint Statement
|
|
|
Round VI of the India-Pakistan
Parliamentarians Dialogue was convened in New Delhi, India, on December 11-12, 2014 at the Parliament
House. The Dialogue was co-chaired by Mr. Awais Khan Leghari, Member of Pakistan�s National
Assembly and Shri Mani Shankar Aiyar, Member of the Indian Rajya Sabha.
Participants conducted candid and
comprehensive discussions on the present status of bilateral relations. At the outset, it was
acknowledged that, owing to recent events, the stalled process of official dialogue is a source of
considerable concern.
Each side reiterated precisely why, from
its own perspective, the official talks have reached the present impasse.
While not necessarily agreeing with the
viewpoint of Parliamentarians from the other country, each group listened with respect and careful
attention to the observations made by Parliamentarians from the other country.
Internal conditions within both countries
deserve primary but not necessarily exclusive considerations. Internal factors can comprise party
policies, electoral pressures, partisan conflicts and public opinion.
At the same time the vital interests of
both States have an inescapable external dimension. This externality in the relationship between India
and Pakistan is due to the unchangeable factors of geography and regional and global geo-
politics.
Regardless of particular, individual
divergences in the internal political situation in each country, there is also a broad consensus in
each country on the position presently being taken by their respective Governments on the process of
talks with the other country. There are virtually unprecedented indications that this situation is
likely to continue for the foreseeable future. At the same time, it was noted that notwithstanding the
gridlock in the official dialogue, diplomatic relations are on an even keel, trade continues, cultural
exchanges continue, despite hiccups, and visa liberalisation has not been adversely affected. The hope
was expressed that these positive factors be reinforced.
Existing official and non-official modes
offer possibilities that should be more actively used to facilitate the resumption of dialogue on
terms that are mutually acceptable.
These 11 modes comprise the
following:
Through initiating a �talks about
talks� process at the Governmental level to set the stage for the resumption of the formal
dialogue.
Through normal diplomatic
channels.
Through the bipartisan
Parliamentary process.
By exercising restraint in the
use of force.
Through back-channel dialogue
which is not publicly reported. The dimension of quiet diplomacy is stressed to ensure undivided,
unimpeded, undistracted negotiations, and not to indefinitely withhold information from public
disclosure. The hopefully positive outcome of back-channel talks must be eventually shared with the
people of both countries.
Through the DG-MOs process being
used on a regular basis to prevent violent incidents across the LoC or across the international border
and through the maintenance of stable peace at the LoC, and the international border, including the
prevention of any cross-border (incursions/incidents).
Through credible, reputed Track-
II Dialogue processes.
Through forums of youth and
digital media.
Through civil society
forums.
Through increased exchanges in
the fields of culture, academia, intellectual inter-actions, sports, especially cricket, trade and
people-to-people exchanges. To facilitate such increases, the rail/road links such as the Khokhrapar-
Munabao route and the Karachi-Mumbai sea route should be revived and sustained.
Through sections of mainstream
media which are willing to actively contribute to the reduction of misperceptions and end the
projection of content that stereotypes and reinforces misperceptions.
It is relevant to recognise that
it is urgently necessary to address critical priorities such as poverty, health, education and
equitable development in each country as well as to deal, separately or jointly, with the volatile
regional and global geo-political situations that have direct implications for both States. Religious
fundamentalism in these circumstances also needs to be firmly resisted in both countries.
Trade has substantially increased
although �Non-Tariff Barriers� and infrastructure problems require to be resolved as also MFN/NDMA
treatment extended to India. It was also stressed that the opening of Consulates in Karachi and Mumbai
would be essential to fulfil the trade potential.
The dimension of people-to-people
contacts is of the foremost importance. Participants urged the intensification of cultural, sports and
academic exchanges enlightened media commentary, further liberalisation of trade and a better people-
to-people visa regime.
While reviewing the status of
implementation of recommendations adopted by the previous 5 Parliamentarians� Dialogues, this meeting
noted with regret that, despite several specific Recommendations having been made in the previous 5
Dialogues, the scope and speed of implementation remained extremely slow, limited or non-existent. The
meeting stressed the need for formation of the India-Pakistan Parliamentary Friendship Group in the
Indian Parliament. In Pakistan, such Groups already exist in the Senate and in the National Assembly
of Pakistan and in the latter there are over 140 Members. The hope was expressed that these Friendship
Groups in each Parliament might meet frequently in a structured dialogue to enhance knowledge and
understanding about actual conditions in the other country.
MPs recognised that through the
creation of enabling circumstances, official talks need to be revived and sustained as a continuous
process. Dialogue, not armed conflict, was deemed to be the only way forward. There is, therefore,
need to jointly strive more effectively to make bilateralism more result-oriented.
The fact that the Nobel Peace
Prize for 2014 was jointly awarded to Kailash Satyarthi of India and Malala Yousafzai of Pakistan,
along with the fortuitous coincidence of the prize-giving ceremony being held in Oslo on the eve of
Dialogue VI vividly illustrates both the symbolic and substantive potential for progressive peace and
cooperation between the two countries.
The Parliamentarians expressed
the hope that the relationship be developed on the basis of mutual respect and recognition of ground
realities. To this end, Parliamentarians on both sides should impress upon their respective
Leaderships the need to create an appropriate environment within which the Government-to-Government
dialogue might be resumed in a peaceful and constructive manner.
Parliamentarians from both sides
recognised and appreciated the initiative of PILDAT to foster these Dialogues. They urged that this
initiative be continued and reinforced.
Parliamentarians also thanked
Senator Javed Jabbar for the assistance he rendered in making their dialogue meaningful.
Parliamentary delegation from
Pakistan included:
PML-N
Mr. Awais Ahmed Khan Leghari
MNA (Punjab)
Senator Mushahid Ullah
Khan (Punjab)
Mr. Muhammad Afzal Khan
MNA (Punjab)
Ms. Maiza Hameed MNA
(Punjab)
Mr. Muhammad Tallal Badar
MNA (Punjab)
Syed Muhammad Ashiq Hussain
Shah MNA (Punjab)
PPPP
Senator Dr. Muhammad Jehangir
Bader (Punjab)
Senator Nawabzada Saifullah
Magsi (Balochistan)
Mr. Muhammad Ayaz Soomro
MNA (Sindh)
Mr. Ramesh Lal MNA
(Sindh)
Other Parties
Mr. Abdul Rashid Godil MNA
(MQM, Sindh)
Senator Hasil Khan Bizenjo
(NP, Balochistan)
Parliamentarians from India who
joined the sixth round of Dialogue included:
BJP
Shri Feroze Varun Gandhi
(Uttar Pradesh)
Shri Shatrughan Prasad
Sinha (Bihar)
Shri Kirti Azad (Bihar)
Congress
Shri Malikaarjun Kharge
(Karnataka)
Shri Anand Sharma
(Rajasthan)
Shri Digvijaya Singh
(Madhya Pradesh)
Shri Ashwani Kumar
(Punjab)
Shri Satyavrat Chaturvedi
(Madhya Pradesh)
Shri Hassan Dalwai
(Maharashtra)
Shri Rajeev Shukla
(Maharashtra)
Kumari Sushmita Dev
(Assam)
Prof. M. V. Rajeev Gowda
(Karnataka)
Dr. Shashi Tharoor
(Kerala)
Shri Gaurav Gogoi (Assam)
Shri Bhubaneswar Kalita
(Assam)
Other Parties
Prof. Saugata Roy (AITC,
West Bengal)
Shri Baijayant Jay Panda
(BJD; Odisha)
Shri B. Parida (BJD;
Odisha)
Shri Pavan Kumar Varma
(JDU; Bihar)
Shri Majeed Memon (NCP;
Maharashtra)
Shri K. T. S. Tulsi
(Independent; Punjab)
Shri Rajeev Chandasekar
(Independent, Karnatak)
Shri Muhammad Salim (CPI,
West Bengal)
Shri Naresh Gujral (SAD,
Punjab)
Shri Neiphiu Rio (NPF,
Nagaland)
Shri Asaduddin Owaisi
(AIMIM, Telangana)
|
|
|
Specific publications that have been published for the benefit of 6th round of MPs Dialogue include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|